This is a diagnostic accuracy study that aimed to assess the reliability of the Persian version of SCID-5-RV. Besides, construct validity was also assessed. Thus, the current study aimed to assess the reliability of the Persian version of SCID-5-RV, including test-retest reliability, and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SCID-5 v, including the criteria validity, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, the current study paves the way for future research to evaluate DSM-5 criteria on the Iranian population or for applying it in other studies and clinical practices. Accordingly, the psychometric properties of the latest version of SCID were evaluated to see whether it has adequate reliability and validity in the nonwestern country. To the best of our knowledge and for linguistic adaptations, this is the first study that translated SCID5-RV in Iran by implementing it in a large and diverse adult clinical sample and assessed the reliability and validity of the SCID-5-RV. The structural clinical interview is used to determine DSM-5 axis I disorders, and it is also useful for research purposes ( 7, 8). For instance, probing and clarifying the questions and their answers cannot be distorted by the respondents’ reading level, which allows for assessing a wide area of psychopathology categorically or dimensionally and accurately capturing the multifactorial nature of psychopathology. Semi-structured interviews, such as the SCID, have several advantages over paper-pencil questionnaires. Therefore, since DSM is the most widely used interview structure in adult psychopathology and availability of several revisions of DSM-5, assessing the reliability and validity of the DSM-5 diagnosis is of crucial importance. To assess the reliability of the DSM-5, a selection of DSM-5 categorical diagnoses was used in a field trial, and it was found that most diagnoses with an adequate sample size had a good to very good reliability. The workgroup who proposed the diagnostic criteria confirmed the face and construct validity of the DSM-5 ( 6). Besides, by adding specifiers for “not otherwise specified” (NOS) and other categories, supplementing the DSM categorical system with dimensions, and expansion of categories, its clinical utility was expanded ( 1, 3). In line with the goal of Research Domain Criteria launched by the National Institute of Mental Health and to address the above-mentioned limitations, the following items were added to the DSM-5: possible shared etiologies, subthreshold symptoms, and cross-cutting symptoms. To this aim, evidence from clinical practice, neurological, genetic literature, epidemiological findings, cognitive neuroscience, and pathophysiology, which yielded important insights about pathology, particularly treat debilitation cases, were used ( 1). Accordingly, for more than a decade, the DSM workgroup was developing the DSM-5. Further, clinicians should know how to increase clinical utility while addressing the shortcomings of previous versions of the DSM, including high comorbidity rates, the exclusive emphasis on categorical classification, a need for incorporating a dimensional approach, and the excessive use of “not otherwise specified” ( 3- 5). Moreover, in-depth information improves treatment planning and monitoring that in turn, enhances the reliability and validity of the diagnostic nosology. To conduct better assessments, clinicians should obtain more in-depth information. Despite its limitations, DSM is a valuable instrument for both practice and research purposes ( 2). Besides, the evolution of each edition of DSM (DSM-1 to DSM-5) indicates a trend toward addressing the limitations of the previous versions ( 1). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), as a semi-structured interview mainly intended to facilitate communications among professionals. Loureiro, +15 authors J.In general, the Persian translation of SCID-5-RV represented acceptable reliability and validity for various categorical diagnoses in different clinical settings.Īssessment Diagnostic Interview Psychometrics Properties Psychological Disorders 1. Clinical validity and intrarater and test–retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 – Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV) validity and intrarater and test–retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 – Clinician Version (SCID‐5‐CV)},Īuthor=,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |